2025-10-10 – Weekly AI News : AI in mid-market businesses

Last week, our community engaged in lively discussions around the practicalities of expanding AI capabilities in mid-sized companies. Several members shared their experiences in testing AI bundles for this market segment, sparking conversations about customization and scalability. There was also an interesting debate on the impact of AI on employment, with some light-hearted takes about AI “stealing” jobs, revealing deeper concerns about automation. Lastly, the topic of AI certifications and their value in career advancement was explored, with diverse opinions on which ones truly offer a competitive edge.


This Week’s Hot Topics

Testing AI bundles for mid-market expansion
Members are discussing strategies and challenges in adapting AI for mid-market businesses. It’s a practical look at how to make AI accessible and effective beyond large enterprises.
Read more here

‘My AI Took Over My Job!’ Jokes or Reality?
This topic dives into the humor and anxiety around AI replacing jobs, touching on real concerns and future predictions. It’s a conversation that’s both engaging and thought-provoking.
Read more here

Which AI Certifications Are Worth It?
A practical discussion about the value of AI certifications. Members are weighing in on which certifications are worth the time and investment for career growth.
Read more here

What’s Your Go-To AI Stack?
A popular thread where professionals share their preferred AI tools and frameworks. It’s a great resource for discovering new tools or affirming your current choices.
Read more here

Books That Boosted Your AI Skills?
This discussion centers on the most impactful books for enhancing AI expertise. If you’re looking to expand your knowledge, you’ll find some solid recommendations here.
Read more here

Are You Following a Learning Roadmap?
Members are sharing their approaches to structured learning in AI. It’s insightful to see how different paths can lead to success in this dynamic field.
Read more here

FAQ/Guidelines
A handy thread for newcomers and veterans alike, outlining the key guidelines and FAQs of our forum.
Read more here

Admin Guide: Getting Started
For those looking to contribute at an administrative level, this guide provides a step-by-step approach to getting involved.
Read more here

Thinking About a Career in AI? Here’s Where to Start!
This is a helpful starting point for anyone considering a move into the AI industry, offering advice and resources to kickstart your journey.
Read more here

How Did You Land Your First Job in AI?
A thread full of personal stories and advice on breaking into the AI field. It’s both inspiring and practical for newcomers.
Read more here


Thank you for being part of our community. Whether you’re catching up or diving into new discussions, I hope you find this week’s topics both engaging and useful.

But ran a 6-week “AI bundle” pilot in finance; <$8k, biggest snag was role-based access.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌‍‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​⁠‍​⁠‌‌‌‍​⁠‌‍⁠​‌⁠​‍‌⁠​⁠‌‍‌⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‌​⁠‌​⁠​​⁠‍​‌‌​​‌⁠‍‍‌‌‌⁠‌‌​​‌‍​‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

Quick tip from a mid-market rollout: we required every bot/flow to have a named owner and a 30-day “keep or kill” review — owner labels, like the office fridge — and it stopped orphaned automations. @amitp1989 on access: we tied tools to SSO groups and logged prompts by team so finance could audit usage and cost. Small caveat: ROI looked flat until we measured cycle-time and error-rate improvements instead of headcount cuts.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌‍‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌​‍‍‌‍⁠⁠‌​‌‍‌‍⁠‌‌‌‌​‌⁠‌‍‌​‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌​⁠‌​‍‌‌‌‌⁠‌​⁠⁠‌​‌‍​⁠‍‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

We only got our mid-market “AI bundle” through procurement by pairing the DPA with a 60‑day escape clause for model changes; otherwise legal iced us for weeks. Building on @amitp1989’s ownership point, a lightweight “prompt registry” in Git with named owners and last‑updated stopped surprise regressions when folks tweaked flows. Net jobs didn’t drop for us, but we did shift contractor spend into one internal “automation steward” who kept the rollout sane.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌‍‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​‍​‌⁠​‍‌‍​‍​‍⁠‌‌​​‌​⁠‍​‌‌‍‌‌‌​⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‍‍‌‌⁠‌‌‌​⁠​‌⁠‍‌​⁠‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

Quick tip: I keep a 120-word cover note with Zendesk/Intercom keywords and add a one-line metric at the top like ‘reduced churn 12% via proactive escalations’ — it bumps reply rates and saves time when roles vanish faster than free donuts. If you can’t apply instantly, batch twice daily and check niche boards (e.g., state licensure pages) for SLP/vet openings since they often lag the big aggregators.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌‍‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​⁠​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌⁠​‌​⁠‌‍‌⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍⁠‍‌​⁠‌‌‍​‍‌‌‍‌‌⁠‍‌‌​⁠‍​‍⁠‌​⁠‌‍‌‍⁠‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

But we balanced customization vs scalability by gating each workflow with LaunchDarkly and running it in ‘shadow mode’ for 14 days in Salesforce — logging suggested actions to a sandbox object, not prod — so managers could approve patterns before we flip the flag. Minor caveat: you’ll need RevOps to pre-map fields, or the review queue turns into a parking lot.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌‍‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​‌​⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠⁠‌​‍⁠‌‌‍​‌​⁠‍‌‍‍⁠‌⁠‌​​⁠​⁠‌‍‌⁠‌​​‍‌‍⁠​‌‌‍‍‌‍​⁠‌​‍⁠‌⁠‌⁠‌‌​‍‌⁠‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

We finally got traction by adding a tiny in‑app “Report AI mistake” button that funnels examples into a Jira queue tagged by customer and workflow, then fixing the top five every Friday. It’s simple, but if you don’t close the loop with a short in‑app note within 72 hours, people stop sending the good stuff.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌‍‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠‌‌‌‍‌‍‌​⁠‌‌​‍‌‌​​‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠⁠‌​‌‍‌‍​⁠‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​⁠‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​⁠‌⁠​​‌​‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

Quick example: when we piloted “AI bundles” with two mid‑sized accounts last week, we added a short why‑line under each AI recommendation (“Why: matched 3 past tickets + SLA breach risk”) with links to the source records, and support escalations fell 18% in 10 days. It adds a bit of UI clutter, but for mid‑market buyers it sped up security reviews and handoffs — if your users hate on‑screen text, an info icon that expands works too.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌‍‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‍‌‍‍​​⁠‌‍​⁠​‍‌‌‍‌‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠​‍‌​‌⁠‌‌​⁠‌​‍​‌⁠​‌‌‌​⁠‌​‍‍‌‍‍‌‌​⁠‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​